Volume 37, Issue 3 (11-2013)
Research in Medicine 2013, 37(3): 194-202 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hariri N, Mojarrad M, Mansouran Y, Afghan M, Ghaedi P. Quality of training workshops of Iranian national library of medicine (INLM) from the viewpoints of professors. Research in Medicine 2013; 37 (3) :194-202
URL: http://pejouhesh.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-1217-en.html
URL: http://pejouhesh.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-1217-en.html
Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Ira 4Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Tehran University, Tehran, Irann , me.mojarrad@gmail.com
Abstract: (7332 Views)
Background: The objective of current research is to study the quality of Digital Integrated Library of Medicine workshops in Iran (INLM).
Materials and Methods: This study was performed with qualitative approach using grounded theory. Sampling was done with purposeful method. Twenty eligible teachers were elected for this study, but after 10 interviews, data saturation was occurred. Data were collected by semi- structured interview. Mean time for interviews was 60 to 75 minutes. Purposeful and continuous analysis of data was performed simultaneously with their collecting. Finally, facilitator and deterrent factors for promoting the quality of INLM workshops were evaluated.
Results: The main variable, which is effective factor on quality of workshops, was named “individual-directorial” factor, which contains 7 subsidiary categories: education, motivation, workshop timing, workshop location, workshop tooling, workshops continuity, and workshop notification. Conclusion: It seems that there are a collection of individual and directorial feathers to held workshops with higher quality.
Materials and Methods: This study was performed with qualitative approach using grounded theory. Sampling was done with purposeful method. Twenty eligible teachers were elected for this study, but after 10 interviews, data saturation was occurred. Data were collected by semi- structured interview. Mean time for interviews was 60 to 75 minutes. Purposeful and continuous analysis of data was performed simultaneously with their collecting. Finally, facilitator and deterrent factors for promoting the quality of INLM workshops were evaluated.
Results: The main variable, which is effective factor on quality of workshops, was named “individual-directorial” factor, which contains 7 subsidiary categories: education, motivation, workshop timing, workshop location, workshop tooling, workshops continuity, and workshop notification. Conclusion: It seems that there are a collection of individual and directorial feathers to held workshops with higher quality.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Interdisciplinary (Educational Management, Educational research, Statistics, Medical education
Received: 2014/01/14 | Accepted: 2014/01/14 | Published: 2014/01/14
Received: 2014/01/14 | Accepted: 2014/01/14 | Published: 2014/01/14
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License | Research in Medicine
Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb